Please confirm topic selection

Are you sure you want to trigger topic in your Anconeus AI algorithm?

Please confirm action

You are done for today with this topic.

Would you like to start learning session with this topic items scheduled for future?

Review Question - QID 5486

In scope icon L 2 B
QID 5486 (Type "5486" in App Search)
Figure A show pre- and post-operative radiographs, from left to right respectively, of a 79-year-old male that underwent revision total hip arthroplasty 2 years ago. He presents today for consultation after 4 episodes of right hip dislocation within the past 6 months. Physical examination reveals a trendelenburg gait with no clinical or radiographic limb length discrepancy. An Infection work-up is negative. Results from a CT scan are shown in Figure B. What would be the best treatment option?
  • A
  • B

Physiotherapy and application of abductor brace

5%

215/3924

Revision arthroplasty to medialize the cementless cup and surgical repair of the abductor tendon

8%

326/3924

Revision arthroplasty to a constrained polyethylene liner

61%

2412/3924

Revision arthroplasty to a femoral component with extended offset

15%

590/3924

Revision arthroplasty to a large ceramic femoral head and offset polyethylene cup

9%

342/3924

  • A
  • B

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

bookmode logo Review TC In New Tab

On the left, Figure A shows a metal-on-metal (MOM) bearing hip resurfacing. On the right, Figure A shows a large head, uncemented metal-on-polyethylene (MOP) total hip replacement. In this setting, the most appropriate treatment option would be revision arthroplasty with constrained polyethylene liner.

Constrained liners should be reserved for patients demonstrating recurrent instability despite treatment with a large femoral head. Other indications include elderly patients who do not require implant longevity or have a low functional demand, as well as patients with deficient or non-repairable abductor mechanisms.

Sikes et al. report on the results of a series of 41 patients (52 hips) with recurrent dislocations. They recommend that large femoral heads (LFH) be used as a first-line treatment in high-risk patients (patients of any age with dementia, neuromuscular disability, and inability to comply with precautions). Constrained liners should be reserved for patients demonstrating recurrent instability despite treatment with an LFH.

Kilampali et al. reviewed late instability of bilateral metal on metal hip resurfacings. They suggest that late instability of hip resurfacing should raise concerns relating to possible local tissue reaction and muscle damage. Concerning features include steeply-inclined acetabular components a large abduction angle of more than 55 degrees along with a combination of small size component.

Figure A shows an image of a revised socket which was performed to convert the MOM THA to a MOP THA. Figure B shows normal parameters of THA components. The recommendation for acetabular position is anteversion 20° ± 10° and abduction 45° ± 10°. For the femur, recommendations are 10°- 15° of anteversion and 41mm - 45mm of offset.

Incorrect Answers:
Answer 1: Conservative treatment would be indicated in patients not suitable for operative intervention.
Answer 2: Medializing the cup would likely increase the potential for dislocation.
Answer 4: Revision arthroplasty to a femoral component with extended offset would help to decrease joint reaction forces. However, this patient has deficient abductors, which is likely related to local tissue reaction and muscle damage from the metal on metal implant.
Answer 5: A large ceramic femoral head and offset polyethylene cup would not help to restore stability.

REFERENCES (2)
Authors
Rating
Please Rate Question Quality

2.7

  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon
  • star icon star icon star icon

(23)

Attach Treatment Poll
Treatment poll is required to gain more useful feedback from members.
Please enter Question Text
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options
Please enter at least 2 unique options